From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 18 14:16:19 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879531065694
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:16:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bounces@nabble.com)
Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE478FC1B
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:16:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156])
	by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <bounces@nabble.com>) id 1MoeG2-0006Rt-Kr
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:16:18 -0700
Message-ID: <25509501.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Freeco <freeco@inbox.lv>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Nabble-From: freeco@inbox.lv
References: <25491958.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<20090917174950.GC34712@ei.bzerk.org>
	<25504647.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<200909180815.n8I8FpFS045063@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
	<25507235.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AB37AE0.2070409@ibctech.ca>
	<4AB37F5D.50206@ibctech.ca>
Subject: Re: IPF, NAT or NIC
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:16:19 -0000




Steve Bertrand wrote:
[ snip ]

> Freeco, let us know how things are connected physically. Your best bet
> would be:
> 
> 				|---------<pc>
> 				|
> ISP>-----------<Gateway>-----<Switch>-----<pc>
> 				|
> 				|_________<pc>



				|-------------<pc>
				|
ISP>-----<Switch>---<Gateway>--<Switch>----<pc>
	    |	\		|
	    |	  \		|_____________<pc>
	    |       \
         <server1>  <server2>

Steve wrote:
...Not depicted, but I'd recommend a firewall for anything between the
gateway and the ISP.

The gateway will work like IPF (Firewall) and NAT. Is it wrong?

Steve wrote:
I just noticed that your ISP has assigned you a /28 prefix.
Is all of this 255.255.255.240 yours, or are you on a shared network
segment? If it is yours, and you plan on using it, you'll want to set
things up like the following. If it is all yours (88.18 - 88.30) and you
didn't request it, I'd sure be interested to know who is giving away
/28's nowadays when the client didn't even request it ;)

Yes, it's mine. I'm paying just for 3 static addresses 18-20. I plan other
static addresses to use for other plans. So i'll need 2 more NIC's for
gateway?

I think that my ISP uses the 2nd image. In my room is a switch. In our home
is switch. 3 homes from mine is a gateway. I don't know what else there is. 

P.S. Sorry for my poor english
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25509501.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.