Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 02:08:34 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Clive Goodhead <clive@swnet.net> Cc: cjclark@alum.mit.edu, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Compiler warning messages Message-ID: <20010214020834.C66720@mollari.cthul.hu> In-Reply-To: <00f701c0966b$f8ee2e80$97393c3e@mshome.net>; from clive@swnet.net on Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:52:33AM -0000 References: <003b01c09666$88e7d820$97393c3e@mshome.net> <20010214012423.Q62368@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> <00f701c0966b$f8ee2e80$97393c3e@mshome.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:52:33AM -0000, Clive Goodhead wrote: > I seem to remember that last time I compiled a new FreeBSD kernel (2.6 at > least a couple of years ago - I am not that new to FreeBSD) the compile was ITYM 2.2.6 - there was no FreeBSD 2.6 Recent versions of gcc are much pickier about what they will accept as "perfect" C code, and we've also enabled more of the warning checks on recent (post-3.x?) releases. i.e. we just didn't used to show the warnings gcc was capable of generating. Kris --V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6ilkhWry0BWjoQKURAsbZAJ4yOwQ7bBEXM2FgjDxA0WE9pNpQiACfb4IG EHuVNkG2VOyxe9YiRmE1ne8= =v1zv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010214020834.C66720>