From owner-freebsd-sparc Sat Nov 9 7:39:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC41537B401 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 07:39:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ruhr.de (in-ruhr4.ruhr.de [212.23.134.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F3E243E6E for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 07:39:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ue@nathan.ruhr.de) Received: (qmail 26345 invoked by uid 10); 9 Nov 2002 15:39:27 -0000 Received: from nathan.internal (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nathan.internal (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gA9FXFdU008510; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 16:33:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ue@nathan.internal) Received: (from ue@localhost) by nathan.internal (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gA9FXENc008509; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 16:33:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 16:33:14 +0100 From: Udo Erdelhoff To: Thomas Moestl Cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sparc64/ebus ebus.c src/sys/sparc64/include ofw_bus.h ver.h src/sys/sparc64/isa isa.c src/sys/sparc64/pci ofw_pci.c ofw_pci.h psycho.c src/sys/sparc64/sparc64 machdep.c ofw_bus.c Message-ID: <20021109153314.GX59222@nathan.ruhr.de> Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Moestl , freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.org References: <200211071607.gA7G7kXF023424@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211071607.gA7G7kXF023424@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 08:07:46AM -0800, Thomas Moestl wrote: > Add two new workaround for firmware anomalies: > 1. At least some Netra t1 models have PCI buses with no associated > interrupt map, but obviously expect the PCI swizzle to be done with > the interrupt number from the higher level as intpin. Is this perhaps a side effect of the hardware difference between the older Netra t1 100/105 and the newer Netra t1 AC/DC 200? I have used both models at work and the differences are significant. Starting with with CPU: Netra t1 105: SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine Netra t1 AC 200: SUNW,UltraAX-i2 Holler if you need addtional data as long it is available from inside Solaris - I cannot take these boxes down. /s/Udo -- I have the heart of an innocent child -- in a small jar on my desk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message