Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Nov 1998 15:57:35 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
To:        "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@plutotech.com>
Cc:        freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: CAMDEBUG change to mull over...
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.02.9811061556230.3059-100000@feral-gw>
In-Reply-To: <199811062353.QAA03708@panzer.plutotech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> > Well- if this is the case, let's nuke CAM_DEBUG_PRINT (at least as it is
> > currently used in cam_xpt.c- it really has to be used only sparingly or
> > you'll never be able to find this debugging any use at all) and allow a
> > set of arbitrary cam paths to used for debugging being enabled. The xpt
> > layer itself has a path (CAM_XPT_PATH_ID).
> 
> I think it's fine to trim down the number of CAM_DEBUG_PRINT statements in
> cam_xpt.c.
> 
> The transport layer path is -1, which is also used to turn on debugging for
> all busses.
> 
> I'd rather come up with something separate from cam_path statements to
> specify which files/modules you want debugging info from.
>

There are two things desired: one is files/modules. There is per-device.
Well, we can discuss it until the cows come home. Why don't I hack for
a while and if something seems of general use, I'll propose it?




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.02.9811061556230.3059-100000>