From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 6 22:35:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183DB1065670 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 22:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f206.google.com (mail-ew0-f206.google.com [209.85.219.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987A08FC2B for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 22:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so1222336ewy.43 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:35:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6jqAbLl15AUKXve2DnVAUKMcg8jOtYm/oH28XJ5+Ep8=; b=nhrlFgu/8fu1SbOJCvDksxHbPJ2oYQXUSFoI5lvLIXy9Y7N60MWKp80kh50kyUUUjJ oeqraQ5Jx6/EL0Up2MMO9uuo4+QdWTVO2cDWjHoA5AMBzitgJ2mD3CxpgGCNkgKUdHDI NDbwJPXghMR+cU3juVfH995QOxVYh1lIaxyYA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fFa5ZaHGBHITzkGYkAAjHcgMAWEIv+54oLrVdYaKod1brsB9oK/vCGNwyefEbksUzd zEEWhmx9u+G2HNRye4EIGWnRkqkeEHaCQk0ck5oNnKXK8O4ja/SplA9ySQyIFk90RGDP A3SfUtcMZ9vFNrgnk08gr05mLewqTpMPxGDmw= Received: by 10.210.12.13 with SMTP id 13mr89323ebl.12.1249598120597; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm1132162eye.24.2009.08.06.15.35.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:35:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:35:09 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090806233509.7935c23d@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <200908051414.49468.david@vizion2000.net> References: <200908051414.49468.david@vizion2000.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: kernel designations terminology confusion -- amd64 used for into quad core X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:35:22 -0000 On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:14:49 +0100 David Southwell wrote: > Hi every one > > My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for > systems with Intel Quad Core processors. > > It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean > why does freebsd use a single manufacturer's name to represent a > genre? The time to complain about that was when they put the "i" in i386.