From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 9 10:40:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA12107 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 10:40:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from second.dialup.access.net (lsmarso.dialup.access.net [166.84.254.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA12021 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 10:39:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from larry@marso.com) Received: (from larry@localhost) by second.dialup.access.net (8.9.1/8.8.8) id NAA16711; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 13:38:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from larry) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 13:38:49 -0500 From: "Larry S. Marso" To: Pat Lynch , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Securing the FreeBSD console Message-ID: <19981209133848.A16603@marso.com> References: <199812090624.AAA12484@Mars.mcs.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.94.13i In-Reply-To: ; from Pat Lynch on Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 12:46:14PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 12:46:14PM -0500, Pat Lynch wrote: > Lets face it, if someone has access to the physical machine, then they > have access to the machine... I think any attempt at locking a screen > usually is not an improvement... I xloxk my machines, but its more of a > habit to keep the cluebies from getting on it, I seriously doubt that > xlock would keep the ones with clue out. > > -P Cryptographic file systems, anyone? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message