Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 13:44:04 -0500 From: Wes Morgan <morganw@gmail.com> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to replace drive in raidz1 Message-ID: <B301A631-071E-41E0-BC02-ABB03E579889@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <780A9427-C9BA-481F-9139-992B323F863B@distal.com> References: <5ED5CB56-2E2A-4D83-8CDA-6D6A0719ED19@distal.com> <AC67D073-D476-41F5-AC53-F671430BB493@distal.com> <CAOtMX2h52d0vtceuwcDk2dzkH-fZW32inhk-dfjLMJxetVXKYg@mail.gmail.com> <CB79EC2B-E793-4561-95E7-D1CEEEFC1D72@distal.com> <CAOtMX2i_zFYuOnEK_aVkpO_M8uJCvGYW%2BSzLn3OED4n5fKFoEA@mail.gmail.com> <6A20ABDA-9BEA-4526-94C1-5768AA564C13@distal.com> <CAOtMX2jfcd43sBpHraWA=5e_Ka=hMD654m-5=boguPPbYXE4yw@mail.gmail.com> <0CF1E2D7-6C82-4A8B-82C3-A5BF1ED939CF@distal.com> <CAOtMX2hRJvt9uhctKvXO4R2tUNq9zeCEx6NZmc7Vk7fH=HO8eA@mail.gmail.com> <29003A7C-745D-4A06-8558-AE64310813EA@distal.com> <780A9427-C9BA-481F-9139-992B323F863B@distal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On September 6, 2024 1:35:22 PM CDT, Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal=2Eco= m> wrote: > > >> On Sep 6, 2024, at 14:21, Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal=2Ecom> wrote= : >> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM >> tank DEGRADED 0 0 0 >> 16506780107187041124 DEGRADED 0 0 0 >> 9127016430593660128 FAULTED 0 0 0 external device fau= lt >> 4094297345166589692 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> 17850258180603290288 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> [=E2=80=A6] >> % sudo zpool replace tank 9127016430593660128 /dev/da10 >> cannot replace 9127016430593660128 with /dev/da10: already in replacing= /spare config; wait for completion or use 'zpool detach=E2=80=99 >> % sudo zpool replace tank 9127016430593660128 diskid/DISK-ZGG0A2PA >> cannot replace 9127016430593660128 with diskid/DISK-ZGG0A2PA: already i= n replacing/spare config; wait for completion or use 'zpool detach=E2=80=99 > > >Another related question=2E I can (and just did) =E2=80=9Cglabel create= =E2=80=9D so the =E2=80=9Cnew=E2=80=9D disk >that is called da10, but is still in chassis drive slot 3 where da3 _used= _ to be=2E >Now the new disk can be descirbed as =E2=80=9Clabel/drive03=E2=80=9D=2E = This is what I do with >ext4 labels on Linux machines on similar hardware=2E > >Can I add labels to the ZFS devices without hurting them? glabel says it >overwrites the last sector with label information it manages=2E Is there= space >on a disk that is used entirely for a ZFS device? No, do not do this=2E Do not do anything at all to a device if the entire = device will be assigned to a pool=2E=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B301A631-071E-41E0-BC02-ABB03E579889>