From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 17 23:47:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA7A16A418 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from smtpoutm.mac.com (smtpoutm.mac.com [17.148.16.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D65013C47E for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (asmtp010-s [10.150.69.73]) by smtpoutm.mac.com (Xserve/smtpout010/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l9HNPZVF003249; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.24.104.90] (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/asmtp010/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id l9HNPYaY026615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:25:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200710172216.l9HMGhbd067251@apollo.backplane.com> References: <470E5BFB.4050903@elischer.org> <470FD0DC.5080503@gritton.org> <20071013004539.R1002@10.0.0.1> <47107996.5090607@elischer.org> <200710172216.l9HMGhbd067251@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marcel Moolenaar Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:25:31 -0700 To: Matthew Dillon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:47:04 -0000 On Oct 17, 2007, at 3:16 PM, Matthew Dillon wrote: > I think the reason you see such a huge degree of virtualized and > para-virtualized environments these days is simply because service > providers can no longer provide all the web services individual > sites > need as a single common set of managed applications. I thought virtualization was used to address under-utilization of hardware and to provide better control over usage parameters that may be covered by SLAs... -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com