Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:11:20 +0300 From: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <rm@FreeBSD.org> To: marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r416822 - head/multimedia/libmediaart Message-ID: <2892fa80-46cd-882c-01b1-b6ffbed03e0b@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <69e47339-0d65-65f7-5cd1-81d44c3140d5@marino.st> References: <201606122049.u5CKnJNs048675@repo.freebsd.org> <69e47339-0d65-65f7-5cd1-81d44c3140d5@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Marino wrote on 06/27/16 02:42 PM: > On 6/12/2016 22:49, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: >> Author: rm >> Date: Sun Jun 12 20:49:19 2016 >> New Revision: 416822 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416822 >> >> Log: >> multimedia/libmediaart: fix packaging >> >> With hat: gnome >> >> Modified: >> head/multimedia/libmediaart/pkg-plist >> >> Modified: head/multimedia/libmediaart/pkg-plist >> ============================================================================== >> >> --- head/multimedia/libmediaart/pkg-plist Sun Jun 12 19:30:21 >> 2016 (r416821) >> +++ head/multimedia/libmediaart/pkg-plist Sun Jun 12 20:49:19 >> 2016 (r416822) >> @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ share/gtk-doc/html/libmediaart/annotatio >> share/gtk-doc/html/libmediaart/ch02.html >> share/gtk-doc/html/libmediaart/home.png >> share/gtk-doc/html/libmediaart/index.html >> -share/gtk-doc/html/libmediaart/index.sgml >> share/gtk-doc/html/libmediaart/left-insensitive.png >> share/gtk-doc/html/libmediaart/left.png >> share/gtk-doc/html/libmediaart/libmediaart-Cache.html >> > > > Hi Ruslan, > Did you test this with poudriere? > This is what we are seeing now with DF poudriere in test mode: > [...] Hi John, Yes it was tested. Actually failed poudriere build was the reason of this change. > The file you pulled out is now orphaned. In any case, changing a plist > requires a portrevision bump. From what I can tell, this change is > erroneous and needs to be reverted, but I'd like somebody to test it in > FreeBSD's poudriere first. > > Regards > John I'll check it out later today. May be my tree was borked in some way at the moment of test. As for PORTREVISION bump, AFAIK it is not required when port is broken and it really was from my poudriere point of view. -- Regards, Ruslan T.O.S. Of Reality
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2892fa80-46cd-882c-01b1-b6ffbed03e0b>