Date: Wed, 26 Jul 1995 21:18:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Aitken <jaitken@cslab.vt.edu> To: sjb@austin.ibm.com (Scott Brickner) Cc: jaitken@cslab.vt.edu, sef@kithrup.com, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: secure/ changes... Message-ID: <199507270118.VAA19165@husky.cslab.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <9507262343.AA18171@ozymandias.austin.ibm.com> from "Scott Brickner" at Jul 26, 95 06:43:50 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I assume you bring this up to point out that the legality of the > issue is independent from persecution on the issue. True. That was exactly my point. Furthermore, the fact that members of the FreeBSD core team just finished a similar ordeal with USL makes it all the more understandable that at least some of them are hesitant to even approach a "gray" issue like this one. > ITAR doesn't cover import. > Were import illegal, PRZ would also be harrassed for the import > of IDEA. He isn't, ergo import is legal. Although I freely admit that I have little or no knowledge of the issues involved, and that you seem to have a fairly good grasp of them, it is generally a logical fallacy to construe the absence of one fact as proof of another. :) -- Jeff Aitken jaitken@vt.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507270118.VAA19165>