From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 26 01:35:50 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC9616A417 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outH.internet-mail-service.net (outH.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB88913C4A8 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:35:49 -0700 X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (home.elischer.org [216.240.48.38]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54DC126800; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47214491.6060209@elischer.org> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:36:17 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freddie Cash References: <200710252120.l9PLKYFJ041330@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> <200710251516.19505.fjwcash+freebsd@gmail.com> <1985.208.70.104.211.1193354645.squirrel@webmail.ibctech.ca> <200710251631.37160.fjwcash+freebsd@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200710251631.37160.fjwcash+freebsd@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA1.5 ISO/ftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:35:50 -0000 Freddie Cash wrote: > On October 25, 2007 04:24 pm Steve Bertrand wrote: >>> Maybe not, but for the bulk of the users of cvsup, csup is a drop-in >>> replacement. :) As with most things in Unix-land, there's more than >>> one way to do things, and every one will defend to the death their >>> way of doing things. :D >> Without taking the time to RTFM, I'll say this: >> >> The first thing I do when I install a new system from an ISO is: >> >> # pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui >> # pkg_add -r fastest_cvsup >> >> Then I copy my supfile(s) from another equivalent box to this one, >> including my refuse file, and: >> >> # cvsup -L 2 -g /etc/supfile && cvsup -L 2 -g /etc/supfile.ports >> >> Will csup work the exact same way, without having to do the pkg_add >> steps? Is this what " a drop in replacement" means? > > Yes. > unless the cvsup file takes the cvs view.