From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 10:53:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5604516A401; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: from shodan.nognu.de (shodan.nognu.de [85.14.216.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5CE43D45; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:53:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: by shodan.nognu.de (Postfix, from userid 1002) id F3C91B81E; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:53:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:53:50 +0200 From: Frank Steinborn To: Boris Samorodov Mail-Followup-To: Boris Samorodov , Sergey Matveychuk , Mark Linimon , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20060509004620.3a8ed7a1@serene.no-ip.org> <20060512035553.GB27663@soaustin.net> <51637568@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <44645A12.3040207@FreeBSD.org> <69557175@srv.sem.ipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <69557175@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Message-Id: <20060512105350.F3C91B81E@shodan.nognu.de> Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Sergey Matveychuk Subject: Re: Do we need a few more ports reviewers/committers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:53:53 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > > But you wrong here. maintainer-update means "Update from Maintainer" but > > you're not yet. So the right class would be change-request. > > Are you sure? Porters handbook Chapter 10 Upgrading: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/port-upgrading.html > ----- > The best way to send us the diff is by including it via send-pr(1) > (category ports). If you are volunteering to maintain the port, be > sure to put [maintainer update] at the beginning of your synopsis line > and set the ``Class'' of your PR to maintainer-update. Otherwise, the > ``Class'' of your PR should be change-request. > ----- > > Did I misunderstood something? If you *are* the maintainer of the port use [maintainer update], otherwise you should consider sending your patch to the maintainer directly or use at least [change-request]. Frank