From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 19:42:01 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7CC16A469; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 19:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@fnop.net) Received: from core.fnop.net (mx.fnop.net [82.102.11.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC8413C47E; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 19:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@fnop.net) Received: from core.fnop.net (mx.fnop.net [82.102.11.82]) by core.fnop.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F251690FA0; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 20:46:28 +0100 (WEST) Received: by core.fnop.net (Postfix, from userid 1015) id 3BD4369105F; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 20:46:28 +0100 (WEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on core.fnop.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 Received: from epsilon.local (62.169.122.58.rev.optimus.pt [62.169.122.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by core.fnop.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF11C690FA0; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 20:46:24 +0100 (WEST) Message-ID: <46DDB4FC.5050505@fnop.net> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:41:48 +0100 From: Rui Paulo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bruce M. Simpson" References: <46DCB831.3030207@fnop.net> <46DD59F9.1080107@freebsd.org> <46DDA265.2090500@fnop.net> <46DDB153.6040909@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <46DDB153.6040909@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann Subject: Re: Killing IPTOS_CE and IPTOS_ECT X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:42:01 -0000 Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > Rui Paulo wrote: >> Well, I was asking for comments regarding on the usage of these flags. >> I was hoping to commit ip.h along with TCP ECN. >> >> This doesn't really need to be before the branch, I think. > > Looks fine to me. ECN would be a useful feature to have. AFAIK nothing > else uses these flags. I have TCP ECN support diff's against CURRENT. I just need to test that everything works as expected. I'll mail -net after that. > Although I do remember it being possible to fingerprint Solaris boxes > based on their response to the ECN Echo, this was around 6 years ago. > > I second Andre's request for a full unified diff if you want it to go in > ASAP. Ok. Thanks. Regards. -- Rui Paulo