Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:41:48 +0100 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net> To: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Killing IPTOS_CE and IPTOS_ECT Message-ID: <46DDB4FC.5050505@fnop.net> In-Reply-To: <46DDB153.6040909@FreeBSD.org> References: <46DCB831.3030207@fnop.net> <46DD59F9.1080107@freebsd.org> <46DDA265.2090500@fnop.net> <46DDB153.6040909@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > Rui Paulo wrote: >> Well, I was asking for comments regarding on the usage of these flags. >> I was hoping to commit ip.h along with TCP ECN. >> >> This doesn't really need to be before the branch, I think. > > Looks fine to me. ECN would be a useful feature to have. AFAIK nothing > else uses these flags. I have TCP ECN support diff's against CURRENT. I just need to test that everything works as expected. I'll mail -net after that. > Although I do remember it being possible to fingerprint Solaris boxes > based on their response to the ECN Echo, this was around 6 years ago. > > I second Andre's request for a full unified diff if you want it to go in > ASAP. Ok. Thanks. Regards. -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46DDB4FC.5050505>