From owner-cvs-all Thu Jun 29 23: 0:51 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from picalon.gun.de (picalon.gun.de [192.109.159.1])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id C7D4137B6FB; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
by picalon.gun.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA28112;
Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:00:26 +0200 (MET DST)
>Received: (from andreas@localhost)
by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA33449;
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:29:23 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from andreas)
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:29:22 +0200
From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>
To: Steve Ames <steve@virtual-voodoo.com>
Cc: Glenn Johnson <gjohnson@nola.srrc.usda.gov>,
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>,
cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
"David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/isc-dhcp - Imported sources
Message-ID: <20000629232922.B27006@titan.klemm.gtn.com>
References: <20000628101529.A63423@node1.cluster.srrc.usda.gov> <200006281721.KAA03680@john.baldwin.cx> <20000629002926.A17817@gforce.johnson.home> <20000629004730.A15014@virtual-voodoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <20000629004730.A15014@virtual-voodoo.com>; from steve@virtual-voodoo.com on Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 12:47:30AM -0500
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT SMP
X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 12:47:30AM -0500, Steve Ames wrote:
> I would happily argue that some of the other standard daemons should
> become "packages" as well _EXCEPT_ that they are expected to appear
> on a BSD platform.
I admit, that the DHCP client is the *most* important part, since most
systems are certainly clients, or ???
But if we already import the ISC-DHCP sources on a vendor branch and
it doesn't seem to me too expensive to import the server side of this...
shouldn't we see it simply as a benefical "add on" ?! Wouldn't it be
more overhead having to install the complete package using the ports
collection, although 50% are are already installed in the BASE system ?
DNS is in BSD included as server and client, as well as NFS ...
maybe we should do this with DHCP as well ??
--
Andreas Klemm http://people.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas
http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/SMP.html
powered by Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD
New APSFILTER 542 and songs from our band - http://people.freebsd.org/~andreas
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message