Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 16:08:13 -0700 From: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, smp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Releasing interrupts? Message-ID: <20001005160813.R58256@canonware.com> In-Reply-To: <200010051918.NAA01346@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 01:18:42PM -0600 References: <XFMail.001005121431.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200010051918.NAA01346@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 01:18:42PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <XFMail.001005121431.jhb@FreeBSD.org> John Baldwin writes: > : You may be able to orchestrate a way to have your thread call kthread_exit(), > : which would work. The person to bug for a kthread_cancel() is Peter though. > : :) > > OK. kthread_exit() is likely sufficient for my needs in NEWCARD. I > can queue a poison pill as easily as I can queue an INSERT or REMOVED > event :-) Good to hear it. With regard to thread cancellation, it's another example of a feature that, if used, usually indicates poor program design, so I hope that we don't find a need for kthread_cancel(). Jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001005160813.R58256>