From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 16 17: 1: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com (mailout04.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8297D37B416 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:01:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 16R0vK-0000tM-01; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 02:00:58 +0100 Received: from spirit.corecode.ath.cx (320050403952-0001@[80.128.111.138]) by fmrl06.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 16R0vB-036lHcC; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 02:00:49 +0100 Received: from elevation.zuhause.stoert.net (elevation.zuhause.stoert.net [192.168.66.46]) by spirit.corecode.ath.cx (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0H10Zg19429; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 02:00:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from corecode@elevation.zuhause.stoert.net) Received: (from corecode@localhost) by elevation.zuhause.stoert.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0H10V544046; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 02:00:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from corecode) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 02:00:28 +0100 From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" To: Alan E Cc: fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [porter's handbook] problems generating pkg-plist automagically Message-Id: <20020117020028.11d7504e.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <200201170026.g0H0QnH05782@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> References: <20020116160826.E2966@iib.unsam.edu.ar> <20020116201954.F2966@iib.unsam.edu.ar> <20020117011302.5d838788.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> <200201170026.g0H0QnH05782@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0claws7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--freebsd4.5) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=.D7ST51RQUI9wm3" X-Sender: 320050403952-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --=.D7ST51RQUI9wm3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:26:49 -0500 Alan E wrote: > On Wednesday 16 January 2002 19:13, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > > > > > you should patch Makefile.am when your port install is using > > automake(doesn't appear to me so). otherwise you have to patch > > Makefile.in because this is the source configure builds the final > > Makefile from. In case you don't want to run automake just for > > creating that modified .in file, it's really better to modify the > > .in file itself. > > I disagree here. IMO you should modify the file at the top of the food > chain. but this means having to use automake/autoconf. is this desired? having to use automake for such a small change that can be easily accomplished by a single patch means people who use the port have to install automake, too. if this port uses automake anyway then modifying Makefile.am would of course be just the right way. cheerz corecode -- /"\ http://corecode.ath.cx/ \ / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \ Against HTML Mail and News --=.D7ST51RQUI9wm3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE8RiIvr5S+dk6z85oRAmN4AKCR/pLPqI70v/A9DlDR3VWv5maORACg0uhQ T1Nt7PCvvadDOllsLvRXAyE= =wKq1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.D7ST51RQUI9wm3-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message