From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 07:18:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD8537B401 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 07:18:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ED343FCB for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 07:18:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[24.147.188.198]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2003070214182901200nj5bfe>; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 14:18:29 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h62EITsi047171 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 10:18:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h62EISZG047168; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 10:18:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20030630201646.6bcae31a.fallenbr@uol.com.br> <44fzlq6uub.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20030701171405.02fa622d.fallenbr@uol.com.br> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 02 Jul 2003 10:18:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030701171405.02fa622d.fallenbr@uol.com.br> Message-ID: <44k7b1c8qz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Problem installing GIMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 14:18:31 -0000 Konrad Scorciapino writes: > > When you build the port, do you *have* a work/gimp-1.2.5/app/gimp-1.2 > > executable at all? > > No It's hard to guess how that could happen, but I'd start by looking at the port skeleton itself; you've probably messed that up.