From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 12:06:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43DE37B401 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 12:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr (ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr [163.178.60.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E57B43F3F for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 12:06:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fabmirha@ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr) Received: by ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr (Postfix, from userid 5481) id 8FDA320045; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 13:01:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684812BFA6 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 13:01:51 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 13:01:51 -0600 (CST) From: Fabio Miranda Hamburger To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: apm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 19:06:06 -0000 Hi, according to the documentation, the "apm" utility is "not well supported" for freebsd. It has been not supported for years. so, When is going to be supported? Why all the development of freebsd is based on /bin /sbin and kernel? I feel like all developers are old unix guru that enjoy console system but there are not abe to develop a modern and versatile system. FreeBSD needs management, ppl that are NOT programmers and understand users needs and focus the development. If the developers prefer to "improve the version of su" they do that and dont care about "window's world utility". Mobile computing is the future!. --- Fabio Andres Miranda Ingenieria de sistemas informaticos Universidad Latina - Costa Rica