From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Jun 10 14:19:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA04177 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 14:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from user.xtdl.com (user.xtdl.com [206.25.228.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA04171 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sderdau@localhost) by user.xtdl.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA09920; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 17:32:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 17:32:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Stephen A. Derdau" To: Cliff Addy cc: "Victor A. Sudakov" , isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Internet providers discouraging customers from unix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk O yes os/2 as well......What diffrence should it make to this providers. As long as their running tcp/ip any os should be acceptable? Who wants to see a one OS world anyways. :) . I hope OS/2 doesn't fade away like many say. I actually purchased OS/2 myself and don't have it running right now. Until I get another hard drive that is. Thanks. Stephen A. Derdau XTDL inc 603 4714700 "It's just a matter of perspective" On Tue, 10 Jun 1997, Cliff Addy wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 1997, Stephen A. Derdau wrote: > > > > on five platforms (MS-DOS, OS/2, Windows 3.1, Windows 95, FreeBSD) and > > > FreeBSD turned out to be the easiest. OS/2 was a nighmare. > > I have to jump in on this. I've never had an easier time than with OS/2 > and FreeBSD, as much as I like and use it, was the worst. > >