From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb  4 02:41:52 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: sparc64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6C716A420;
	Sat,  4 Feb 2006 02:41:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D622B43D45;
	Sat,  4 Feb 2006 02:41:51 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k142eUPc054831;
	Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:40:30 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Message-ID: <43E4142A.4@samsco.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:40:42 -0700
From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051230
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
References: <8664nwrbp8.fsf@xps.des.no>	<20060203102659.GA66445@xor.obsecurity.org>	<861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no>
	<20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed 
	version=3.1.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org
Cc: stable@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org,
	sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 02:41:52 -0000

Warner Losh wrote:
> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
> Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:53:38 +0100
> 
> 
>>Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
>>
>>>COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs.
>>
>>Hmm, yes, apparently it only uses -O2 on HEAD.
> 
> 
> Can we not have special flags for tinderbox builds?  It make
> pre-commit testing a big pita.  How about just -O on both head and in
> RELENG_6?  The kernel make files have special magic to disable the
> parts of -O2 that are known to be bad because tinderbox uses -O2,
> despite efforts in the past to stop the practice.
> 
> Warner
> 
> 

There is value in testing -O2, since enabling that is a good long-term
goal.  What might be nice is to run tinderboxes with all default
compiler settings, and then once or twice a week to a special run that
has the more experimental flags.

Scott