Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:26:01 +0200
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To:        Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org, johnea <me@johnea.net>
Subject:   Re: openssh concerns
Message-ID:  <86hbugyb06.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <20091003042802.O10039@sola.nimnet.asn.au> (Ian Smith's message of "Sat, 3 Oct 2009 04:43:08 %2B1000 (EST)")
References:  <4AC545C3.9020608@johnea.net> <19141.20047.694147.865710@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <4AC61C0B.3050704@johnea.net> <20091003042802.O10039@sola.nimnet.asn.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> writes:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers provides a=
=20
> reasonably useful list of ports NOT to choose for an obscure ssh port.

In practice, you have no choice but to use someting like 443 or 8080,
because corporate firewalls often block everything but a small number of
ports (usually 20, 22, 80, 443, 8080, and odds are that 20, 80 and 8080
go through a transparent proxy)

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hbugyb06.fsf>