Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:26:52 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> To: miwi@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KMS on 9-STABLE Message-ID: <CAN6yY1to7fauJRgGKvvGyA2_u4rmzjdyajNh2DgH9FYGn4byhA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120608150345.66ef85f7.miwi@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAN6yY1uL9OZiiZYqs6Mf7iMv99G8j3Bria9dGXtG30mDd8xPNg@mail.gmail.com> <20120608150345.66ef85f7.miwi@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Martin Wilke <miwi@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:18:37 -0700 > Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Any change of seeing the Intel KMS stuff merged into 9-STABLE before >> 9.1? > > Yes more or less 3 weeks to go.. > > -- > +------------------oOO--(_)--OOo----------------+ > > Facebook: =A0 =A0 =A0 miwi1 > Twitter: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0miwi_ Thanks, Martin. And thank you and the rest of the x11 team for all of your work in trying to keep X11 usable with increasingly Linuxized sources. I find it ironic that this should be the case after all of the work done in the early days of X (x11R1 through X11R6) to make X entirely OS agnostic, even to make driver binaries run on other OSes like VMS. (Of course, DEC put a to of resources into early releases of X.) Now, to survive the next three weeks (more or less). --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1to7fauJRgGKvvGyA2_u4rmzjdyajNh2DgH9FYGn4byhA>