From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 6 16:14:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4466E16A401; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean@cyberwang.net) Received: from spunkymail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-207.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CCB13C45D; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean@cyberwang.net) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (68-184-120-224.dhcp.smyr.ga.charter.com [68.184.120.224]) by spunkymail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DB5109F2F; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <461671CF.6060903@cyberwang.net> Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 12:14:07 -0400 From: Sean Bryant User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070313) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek References: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> <4615BCA4.7030109@cyberwang.net> <20070406104004.GB1251@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20070406104004.GB1251@garage.freebsd.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 16:14:11 -0000 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 10:36:52AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> Sean Bryant wrote: >> >> >>> Is it fully 128bit? From wikipedia, which is by no means an authoritative source but I have no idea if this was ever an issue. >>> >> It's 64-bit even in Solaris. The "128-bitness" is only in the storage format, not for file system ops visible to applications. >> >> (AFAIK). >> > > That's correct. We are limited by POSIX, but the on-disk format is > 128bit. > > Thanks for the update, I'll probably update that Wikipedia entry to reflect recent changes and more correctly state the limitations.