Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 19:52:02 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ipfw@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238694] Configuring & using a customized IPFW rule set now causes additional rles to be (involuntarily) added Message-ID: <bug-238694-8303-jtHaOqNxSR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-238694-8303@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-238694-8303@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238694 --- Comment #11 from Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg-freebsd@tristatelogic.com> --- Just FYI for everyone -- As it happens, *I* have "set up a script that doesn't provide IPv6 rules, a= nd DOES wind up blocking them (e.g. via the default at the end)"... or so I believe anyway. The system in question appears to be humming along just fine. (I am typing this message on it as we speak.) P.S. I would love to find a person or two who is/are more knowledgable abo= ut firewalls than I am... which is to say just about anybody... and who would= be willing to take a peek at my current IPFW rule set and critique it for me.= =20 Understandably, I am not eager to just post the thing publicly (in case it = has gaping holes that I'm not aware of) but if anyone is willing to take a peek, please email me privately and I'll seed you a pastebin link and we can take= it from there. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-238694-8303-jtHaOqNxSR>