Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 21:58:51 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cost/benefit of some src.conf options Message-ID: <8dc8d8b5-2f54-ce3e-66eb-515ea86642c6@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <3bd2010aa225111baa2e813071a88b27@bsdforge.com> References: <YF3pHo5Pj5Swm90O@ceres.zyxst.net> <56F46324-59BB-4CC2-BE90-5FF63C4554ED@FreeBSD.org> <79a899c3-368e-20d2-8ac7-0741e00fa3b1@netfence.it> <3bd2010aa225111baa2e813071a88b27@bsdforge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/26/21 10:35 PM, Chris wrote: > My understanding is that retpoline is really only of interest if your > box might > accessed *locally* by *untrusted* individuals. Thanks. Does an user on a guest VM qualifies as *untrusted*? Or does a closed-source software on such VM? In any case, if RETpoline is so, then is IBRS. The comparison would still be interesting to me.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8dc8d8b5-2f54-ce3e-66eb-515ea86642c6>