Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:35:11 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Szilveszter Adam <sziszi@bsd.hu> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Which .info files have been disabled? Message-ID: <20020629103511.A10195@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020629132919.GC883@fonix.adamsfamily.xx>; from sziszi@bsd.hu on Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 03:29:20PM %2B0200 References: <20020628154933.GA1938@fonix.adamsfamily.xx> <20020629132919.GC883@fonix.adamsfamily.xx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 03:29:20PM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> 1) The GNU folks have a way of generating GDBvn.texi from version.in, so
> that it has the same version information than the source code. We use
> the GDBvn.texi file supplied with the distribution. (which was not
> updated BTW, so it still says 4.18) Do we want to use
> this method,
Yes. Please use (untested):
GDBvn.texi: version.in
@echo '@set GDBVN "`sed q ${.ALLSRC}`"' >${.TARGET}
> or stick with the hard-coded one we are using now? In which
> case GDBvn.texi needs updating.
I'll cvs rm it.
> 2) We generate a file named "inc-hist.texi", but the GNU call this
> "inc-hist.texinfo". It is possible to patch the file gdb.texinfo which
> includes it, or it is possible to change our target in
> src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/doc/Makefile appropriately. Since it is not
> used anywhere else, I decided on the latter. This is also included in
> the patch.
Just change our target.
> Please, review the patch, and, if you like it, apply it. Please send any
> and all comments to me or to the list. (but preferably not to both)
Thanks for the patch. Could you change the GDBvn.texi handling and
retest?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020629103511.A10195>