From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Mar 3 16: 7:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from tnt.isi.edu (tnt.isi.edu [128.9.128.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5BA156AB for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:07:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from larse@ISI.EDU) Received: from pub.isi.edu (pub.isi.edu [128.9.160.77]) by tnt.isi.edu (8.8.7/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA24517 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:07:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from larse@localhost) by pub.isi.edu (8.8.7/8.8.6) id QAA21090; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:07:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14045.52904.203434.168977@pub.isi.edu> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:07:04 -0800 (PST) From: Lars Eggert To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: preferred IPsec stack for -current? Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi, we're developing a system (http://www.isi.edu/~xbone/) which will support both IPsec and Ipv6, among other things. With the KAME/INRIA IP code being merged, which IPsec/IPv6 stack is preferred right now for 3.1-release and 4.0-current? We will probably patch the stack to use the generic tunneling code we have under development; which stack will make it more likely that our changes will make it into the merged version? Thanks, Lars ______________________________________________________________________________ Lars Eggert Information Sciences Institute http://www.isi.edu/~larse/ University of Southern California -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNt3OptZcnpRveo1xAQEBCwP/cXXe9XH9uFZDK4vkPNVgp2gqR38lyXwf iLUHPjKd+eKBvY4ayagfD/cmFPAysLsNuWcND0yaetXAzHiQFnoxrbF1qFG4soWv lXAOIM7N8Z9fRl6JUxOW9krEiDJHTHspXm/zwbMC0WTbuftqgi0Q2Wy6/o//3LkS 909h11LzAhc= =i+3V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message