From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb  4 19:15:37 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D675A16A42C;
	Sat,  4 Feb 2006 19:15:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5870543D46;
	Sat,  4 Feb 2006 19:15:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged))
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k14JDjCl015092;
	Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:13:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:13:49 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20060204.121349.06228212.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: kmacy@fsmware.com, kip.macy@gmail.com
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170602040848p15a21fdibeecbd9ea8d34044@mail.gmail.com>
References: <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no>
	<20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<b1fa29170602040848p15a21fdibeecbd9ea8d34044@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0
	(harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]);
	Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:13:46 -0700 (MST)
Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, harti@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org,
	stable@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, des@des.no
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 19:15:38 -0000

In message: <b1fa29170602040848p15a21fdibeecbd9ea8d34044@mail.gmail.com>
            Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> writes:
: IIRC, at NetApp -O2 was the default for all builds. I think it is safe to
: say that the generated code is quite stable. If -O2 allows the compiler to
: catch errors earlier it should be the default.

If things have really changed, then we should change the default and
remove the kludges.  My main objection is the mismatch, not the actual
value.  Did you remove the kludges in the mk files at netapp to remove
the -fno-strict-alias?

Warner