Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:04:06 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GEOM architecture and the (lack of) need for foot-shooting Message-ID: <20050408050405.GA5203@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <09c6072206df99be25e345b7e13354f5@xcllnt.net> References: <21342.1112914675@critter.freebsd.dk> <09c6072206df99be25e345b7e13354f5@xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:06:20PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Typical problem cases include partial overlaps between on-disk and > in-core partitions. This is easy to catch and can always result in a I don't think that in-core and on-disk partition must have influence to each other in any way. Better for them be completely independent. Once read, in-core partition should not know anything about what happens with on-disk one. > I think that having a single view is probably what's biting. If you Yes. But who speak about single view? If we have in-core and on-disk partition separately, we need _two_ independent views, choosed f.e. by some option. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050408050405.GA5203>