From owner-freebsd-bluetooth@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 13:41:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42E510656C5 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FD58FC14 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7096122FAD2; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:21:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:21:22 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: M1Nr9nv0zHyZLi0z3Vd+dX+UX3y0PWFm3XU1SSkwbvOj 1232457682 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92190168DC; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:21:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4975CFD0.1000002@incunabulum.net> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:21:20 +0000 From: Bruce Simpson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maksim Yevmenkin References: <200901152225.19150.hselasky@c2i.net> <200901161012.24544.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org" , Alfred Perlstein , Hans Petter Selasky Subject: Ongoing Bluetooth work; Linux-like APIs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Using Bluetooth in FreeBSD environments List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:41:18 -0000 Hi guys, I am pleased to see all the hard work going in to maintaining the FreeBSD Bluetooth support... I wonder though if anyone has considered implementing the Linux APIs ? It's kinda difficult to build applications with what we currently have in FreeBSD -- a whole host of higher level language bindings have popped up. Whilst they've done work on making sure it works on Windows with all the stacks they have there, I wonder if FreeBSD's being different from Linux is doing us any good here. Just a suggestion... as it is, I've had to side-step FreeBSD for the time being for what I am cooking at the moment :-( cheers BMS