From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 8 18:44:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBE416A41F for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 18:44:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk (pasmtp.tele.dk [193.162.159.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C3E43D46 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 18:44:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (0x535c0e2a.sgnxx1.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [83.92.14.42]) by pasmtp.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05C11EC312 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:44:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j98HcEJU004150; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:38:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Craig Rodrigues From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:46:20 EDT." <20051008024620.GA29824@crodrigues.org> Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 19:36:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4128.1128793019@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Teaching mount(8) to use nmount() X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 18:44:12 -0000 In message <20051008024620.GA29824@crodrigues.org>, Craig Rodrigues writes: >Since I don't know how all the existing mount programs work, and I >don't know the dependencies on how UFS mounting works, I propose >an interim behavior for mount: Good plan. >I would appreciate any comments on the attached patch. No obvious bogons spotted. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.