From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 9 03:25:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF3316A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 03:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 21322530218.direct.eti.at (21322530218.direct.eti.at [213.225.30.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1F643D4C for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 03:25:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tilman@arved.at) Received: from huckfinn-wi0.arved.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i39APnkC082952; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:25:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tilman@arved.at) Received: (from tilman@localhost) by huckfinn-wi0.arved.de (8.12.11/8.12.6/Submit) id i39APmqa082951; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:25:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: huckfinn-wi0.arved.de: tilman set sender to tilman@arved.at using -f Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:25:48 +0200 From: Tilman Linneweh To: Jason Lixfeld Message-ID: <20040409102548.GW64506@arved.at> References: <1136DB62-8983-11D8-9A25-000A95989E4A@lixfeld.ca> <20040408210939.GA79932@arved.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Anyone using AMD64 + FreeBSD + openldap? (was: openldap-2.1.27 - X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 10:25:51 -0000 * Jason Lixfeld [2004-04-09 06:25]: > On Apr 8, 2004, at 5:09 PM, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > > >* Jason Lixfeld [Do, 08 Apr 2004 at 19:35 GMT]: > >>>I use OpenLDAP 2.2/back-bdb/bdb 4.2.52+patches on RELENG_4. > >>>I don't see such problems. I just now starting to toy with > >>>RELENG_5_2. > >> > >>What hardware are you using? I can't run BDB because of AMD64 issues > >>with fast mutexes so I'm using ldbm instead. > >> > >>>I also note that I haven't had any problems using db_recover > >>>to recover from hard crashes. > >> > >>Again, this would be fine if I could run BDB. > > > >Matthias Andree suggested, a possible workaround to the problems with > >the fast mutexes may be to add --with-mutex=x86/gcc-assembly to the > >CONFIGURE_ARGS. > > I'm using ports, so I added that to the Makefile in two locations. I > also noted that the configure script didn't seem to have an option for > --with-mutex when I ran ./configure --help. Modified Makefile is > below. > Sorry for being unclear. Not to the openldap port, but the BDB port you are running (e.g. db41). regards tilman