From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 26 17:45:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C709E106564A; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F278FC0C; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from [85.173.16.254] (helo=moosi) by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1MKFUd-0003oH-EA; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:45:43 +0400 To: Juergen Lock References: <20090606162235.GA49444@triton.kn-bremen.de> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:46:30 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20090606162235.GA49444@triton.kn-bremen.de> (Juergen Lock's message of "Sat\, 6 Jun 2009 18\:22\:35 +0200") Message-ID: <43784537@ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: flash10 vs f10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:45:45 -0000 Juergen Lock writes: > Anyway, on to www/linux-f8-flashplugin10 with OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT > and OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS both f10: I got that going after > removing libidn from the port's USE_LINUX_APPS (its part of linux_base-f10) > and installing two new dependencies of f10's libcurl: > libldap-2.4.so.2 in openldap-2.4.12-1.fc10.i386.rpm > and > libsasl2.so.2 in cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.22-19.fc10.i386.rpm > (so we'll need two new ports for these), Are you sure that those two ports are necessary? I had no reports that something doesn't work without those libraries. > and then finally to get > libflashsupport working too (i.e., audio) I had to > ln -s libssl.so.7 /compat/linux/lib/libssl.so.6 > - so we probably need a new linux-f10-flashsupport too if we want to > avoid that symlink. Can you provide one? Then we can create a repocopy and commit a new port. Thanks! WBR -- bsam