From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jan 15 22:58:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA04358 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 22:58:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA04354 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 22:58:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA21038; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 09:57:57 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 09:57:54 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: Satoshi Asami cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk patch for review In-Reply-To: <199801160620.WAA02177@bubble.didi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote: > Yes, we can certainly fix this in bsd.port.mk but I think this just > illustrates that it's patch that really needs to be fixed. Can we > tell POSIX to go fsck itself and make patch work the same on all > versions of FreeBSD? Different options and different behaviour are intentional move of patch maintainers and are well documented in patch(1), so we can't change it. Preferred variant will be bring patch 2.5 from -current to -stable, but since I not run -stable, I prefer somebody else to do MFC, could it be you? Then we can add -b to bsd.port.mk safely. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/