From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 21:17:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9742E16A41F; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:17:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (zarniwoop.nitro.dk [83.92.207.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A204D43D6E; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:17:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000) id 3E762114C1; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:17:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:17:25 +0100 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Message-ID: <20051227211724.GJ844@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <1135714847.83838.34.camel@localhost> <20051227202546.GS63497@over-yonder.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uc35eWnScqDcQrv5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051227202546.GS63497@over-yonder.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Pav Lucistnik , FreeBSD AMD list Subject: Re: Sharing /usr/ports between AMD64 and I386 ok? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:17:30 -0000 --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2005.12.27 14:25:46 -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 09:20:47PM +0100 I heard the voice of > Pav Lucistnik, and lo! it spake thus: > > Francisco Reyes p??e v ?t 27. 12. 2005 v 14:55 -0500: > >=20 > > > Is /usr/ports the same for AM64 and I386? > >=20 > > The FreeBSD Ports Collection is one and the same across all the > > releases and architectures. >=20 > Just make sure you scrupulously `make clean`, or sooner or later > you'll end up installing a dependancy on the wrong architecture. Not > that I've ever done such a thing, you understand... Or simply set WRKDIRPREFIX in make.conf to some directory on a local file system - then you don't have the overhead of writing temporary files to NFS and the multiple clients NFS mounting the ports collection won't ever clash (at least not wrt. to ports builds). --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDsa9kh9pcDSc1mlERAiV9AJoDzhGLGn/+B7M3wFoJFbhKgEcOEwCgk9LP tL+MIc94VqSE8f19GWCASCI= =v66i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5--