From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 11 08:24:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81DB16A445; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:24:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FD443D49; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:24:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CCB60F3; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:24:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C4C60F2; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:24:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2275233C3B; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:24:45 +0200 (CEST) To: Stefan Farfeleder References: <200506110321.j5B3LKi2025443@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050611072537.GB39090@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:24:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20050611072537.GB39090@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> (Stefan Farfeleder's message of "Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:25:38 +0200") Message-ID: <8664wlpagi.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -5.1/5.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on tim.des.no Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Marcel Moolenaar , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-raid.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:24:54 -0000 Stefan Farfeleder writes: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 03:21:20AM +0000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > Avoid GCC optimizations from injecting a call to memset(?) in order > > to initialize the buffer array in ata_raid_attach() by removing the > > initializer. > Maybe GCC should be taught to generate a bzero call instead? no, it should be taught to always inline the initialization. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no