From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 20 12:54:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76A716A4BF; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D54043F93; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:54:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h7KJsekN072087; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:54:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.3/Submit) id h7KJseFs072086; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:54:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:54:40 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: "Bruce A. Mah" Message-ID: <20030820125440.A66805@xorpc.icir.org> References: <510776858.1061372094@melange.errno.com> <20030820172342.GA69189@intruder.kitchenlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030820172342.GA69189@intruder.kitchenlab.org>; from bmah@freebsd.org on Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:23:42AM -0700 cc: Sam Leffler cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFR: bridge locking X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:54:44 -0000 On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:23:42AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Sam Leffler wrote: > > > One other minor change: I moved the printf "BRIDGE 020214 loaded" under > > bootverbose. Can anyone tell me what 020214 means? yes, it is a timestamp -- just to get an idea on when the code was last touched. cheers luigi > I recently started using bridge(4) functionality and was wondering > about this too. Based on the output of "cvs annotate" and "cvs log", > I concluded that it was a datestamp used by Luigi to keep track of > which version he was working with (on HEAD, this line was last touched > in revision 1.45, which was committed on 15 February 2002). > > Bruce.