From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 28 02:16:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: java@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C7208D9 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 02:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3331D256B for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 02:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s5S2G2OP031959 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 03:16:02 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191403] java/openjdk8-8.5.13_7 java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start throwing IOException: no such file or directory Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 02:16:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jkim@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Issue Resolved X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: java@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 02:16:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191403 --- Comment #5 from Jung-uk Kim --- (In reply to ljboiler from comment #3) > Since I reported the bug against PORTREVISION 7, and you just tested it > against PORTREVISION 8 (commited, what, just hours ago?), it might be safe > to say that the new version fixed the problem. I'll build it and report > back. I committed it but I am 100% sure it was not a fix for your problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.