From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 30 14:20:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6921316A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:20:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vimes.aminor.no (vimes.aminor.no [213.187.177.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1CB43D31 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:20:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@aminor.no) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (rincewind.eivind [192.168.0.2]) by vimes.aminor.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A161700F; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:20:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:20:07 +0200 From: Eivind Olsen To: masta@wifibsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <40929332.5080704@linuxpowered.com> References: <340419687.1083326256@[10.122.7.143]> <40929332.5080704@linuxpowered.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.3 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPSEC, IPv6, RELENG_5_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 21:20:05 -0000 --On 30. april 2004 12:56 -0500 masta wrote: > FAST_IPSEC and hi/fn hardware acceleration are mutually exclusive. > Try without FAST_IPSEC. Are you sure? I was under the impression that to support hardware acceleration in IPSEC I must use FAST_IPSEC? Here's what the FreeBSD handbook says, on "Note: FreeBSD 5.X contains a ``hardware accelerated'' IPsec stack, known as ``Fast IPsec'', that was obtained from OpenBSD. It employs cryptographic hardware (whenever possible) via the crypto(4) subsystem to optimize the performance of IPsec." -- Regards / Hilsen Eivind Olsen