From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 19 16:01:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D6016A4CF for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:01:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz [66.92.171.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2089943D54 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:01:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz) Received: by mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Postfix, from userid 80) id 6578061BC; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:00:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 141.156.69.109 ([141.156.69.109]) by www.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Horde) with HTTP for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:00:50 -0400 Message-ID: <20041019120050.uscwo4c8kco4g44s@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:00:50 -0400 From: Kenneth Culver To: Kris Kennaway References: <20041015190638.C5A0E5D04@ptavv.es.net> <41715E7F.7060509@ng.fadesa.es> <20041018100045.f8koww0skcco0woo@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> <4173D66F.6010200@DeepCore.dk> <4173F2E9.7010407@ng.fadesa.es> <417406E3.9010706@DeepCore.dk> <4174FD04.8040000@ng.fadesa.es> <20041019104525.ikgw8kcw8sw480os@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> <20041019155848.GA55255@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041019155848.GA55255@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs cc: fandino@ng.fadesa.es cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3b7and poor ata performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:01:09 -0000 Quoting Kris Kennaway : > On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:45:25AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: > >> This is with a custom kernel with all debugging options off. I >> haven't seen a >> mail from you yet that says whether you turned off debugging options in the >> kernel or not, and if you haven't turned off debugging options, I'd strongly >> suggest doing so. > > In fact he's said so several times. > > Kris OK, well I must've missed it then and I apologize for that, however, I still don't see any reason why his hardware would perform so much worse than mine, aside from the something being wrong with his hardware setup, or the driver for his particular ata chip. Ken