From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Jun 28 14:20:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DEE2B85634; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A4FE21F1; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [195.77.206.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430DF43C26; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:19:52 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: svn commit: r416822 - head/multimedia/libmediaart To: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov , marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201606122049.u5CKnJNs048675@repo.freebsd.org> <69e47339-0d65-65f7-5cd1-81d44c3140d5@marino.st> <2892fa80-46cd-882c-01b1-b6ffbed03e0b@FreeBSD.org> From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org Message-ID: <551e7725-b26b-21f1-1fab-4663e72e8be1@marino.st> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:19:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2892fa80-46cd-882c-01b1-b6ffbed03e0b@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 160627-1, 06/27/2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:20:01 -0000 On 6/28/2016 16:11, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > I'll check it out later today. May be my tree was borked in some way at > the moment of test. As for PORTREVISION bump, AFAIK it is not required > when port is broken and it really was from my poudriere point of view. I think that's only true if the port doesn't build at all and never did. The port was building regardless of the validity of the pkg-plist. At least for DF, it wasn't broken (and in fact was perfectly correct). Hopefully some gracious third party will run this through their poudriere so we can determine if your ports tree is the culprit or not. Or maybe somebody else can confirm it was broken. I don't recall seeing any breakage on FreeBSD though. JOhn --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus