From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 17 15:25:13 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA11897 for current-outgoing; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 15:25:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA11891 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 15:25:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by narnia.plutotech.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA08448; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 16:24:14 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199703172324.QAA08448@narnia.plutotech.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0beta 12/23/96 To: ac199@freenet.hamilton.on.ca cc: Warner Losh , Richard Wackerbarth , =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=AFren?= Schmidt , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which lists for discussion. In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Mar 1997 17:29:46 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 16:24:14 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >On Mon, 17 Mar 1997, Warner Losh wrote: > >> Actually, here's the list >> 2.0.x dead >> 2.1.x stagnant >> 2.2.x stable, by definition > >Arguably, it's not stable until wcarchive runs it. Arguably, it's not stable until many large servers with different types of workloads are running it. Wcarchive finds many bugs, but not all. Busy news servers find many bugs in the I/O system than wcarchive doesn't see because of it's large cache and the limits of its 100BT pipe to the net. >-- >tIM...HOEk >Who's been messing with my anti-paranoi shot?! -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================