Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:57:22 -0500 (CDT)
From:      "Valeri Galtsev" <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu>
To:        "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@sohara.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Unusual Question
Message-ID:  <60058.128.135.52.6.1499702242.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20170710163351.a347713b6d8f64e141d1d9f2@sohara.org>
References:  <888578F8-AD68-4993-823C-152789F3C929@mail.sermon-archive.info> <52627.76.193.16.95.1499645892.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <BF16E1CF-A889-4734-981E-2B68115FCD3C@mail.sermon-archive.info> <20170710052228.GA2338@c720-r314251> <20170710090547.15ee3afc07c09955ba621ae1@sohara.org> <26749.128.135.52.6.1499700385.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <20170710163351.a347713b6d8f64e141d1d9f2@sohara.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mon, July 10, 2017 10:33 am, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:26:25 -0500 (CDT)
> "Valeri Galtsev" <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote:
>
>> I believe, the kernel addresses swap not by addressing sectors on raw
>> device covering the whole physical drive, but as "relative sectors"
>> through swap partition device.
>
> 	Sure, but I doubt it reads the partition table again after it has
> it read the first time, that's an obvious thing to cache.
>
>> If I'm right, once drive partition table is
>> gone reading swap will fail and panic kernel.
>
> 	I doubt it, the partition table should be cached in memory,
> otherwise yes that would panic the kernel, but reading the partition table
> every time a page needs swapping in would be stupidly inefficient so I
> don't believe it happens.

I agree, it will be inefficient if it were programmed that way... however,
whenever I add partition with gpart, partition table gets re-read, and new
device gets created. That is what probably confused me (as gpart may
trigger kernel re-read partition table, whereas dd unlikely will).

Valeri

>
>> But the suggestion you made in another post: to make
>
> 	Not my suggestion, it's a sensible one but I don't think it's
> needed.
>
> --
> Steve O'Hara-Smith                          |   Directable Mirror Arrays
> C:>WIN                                      | A better way to focus the
> sun
> The computer obeys and wins.                |    licences available see
> You lose and Bill collects.                 |    http://www.sohara.org/
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?60058.128.135.52.6.1499702242.squirrel>