Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 11:02:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199820] [new port] www/rubygem-html-pipeline Message-ID: <bug-199820-13-AxtGICE5ik@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-199820-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-199820-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D199820 --- Comment #5 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Torsten Z=C3=BChlsdorff from comment #4) > It's possible to install all rubygems only with the rubygem tool=20 > and completely without pkg. I wasn't advocating that. It is recognized that if the gem is needed, it n= eeds to be installed with pkg. It was standalone gems there were targeted. I am saying, don't have 96 ports. Have one port with 96 gems, essentially creating your own bundle.=20 It's not a standard thing to do, but it might be the best approach in this = case -- if the vast majority of these gems only have a single purpose. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199820-13-AxtGICE5ik>