Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 06 May 2015 11:02:59 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 199820] [new port] www/rubygem-html-pipeline
Message-ID:  <bug-199820-13-AxtGICE5ik@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199820-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-199820-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D199820

--- Comment #5 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Torsten Z=C3=BChlsdorff from comment #4)
> It's possible to install all rubygems only with the rubygem tool=20
> and completely without pkg.

I wasn't advocating that.  It is recognized that if the gem is needed, it n=
eeds
to be installed with pkg.   It was standalone gems there were targeted.

I am saying, don't have 96 ports.  Have one port with 96 gems, essentially
creating your own bundle.=20

It's not a standard thing to do, but it might be the best approach in this =
case
-- if the vast majority of these gems only have a single purpose.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199820-13-AxtGICE5ik>