From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 29 06:27:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BD30A16A4CE; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 06:27:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gvr.gvr.org (gvr-gw.gvr.org [80.126.103.228])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4ADF843D2D; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 06:27:00 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from guido@gvr.org)
Received: by gvr.gvr.org (Postfix, from userid 657)
	id 8F6FC40; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:26:59 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:26:59 +0100
From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>
To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>,
	Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>,
	src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20040129142659.GA23750@gvr.gvr.org>
References: <200401291316.i0TDGpbj052050@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20040129132732.GB19899@FreeBSD.org.ua> <xzpu12e7sr7.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040129140955.GX47004@submonkey.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040129140955.GX47004@submonkey.net>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/mount mount.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:27:01 -0000

On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 02:09:55PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 03:07:40PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > Did you mean -u here, because -a is not listed as allowed
> > > in combination with the -o option?
> > 
> > no, his patch makes
> > 
> > # mount -u -o fstab -a -t ufs
> > 
> > work as expected (i.e. restore the fstab flags on all ufs filesystems)
> > 
> > previously,
> > 
> > # mount -u -o fstab /specific/mount/point
> > 
> > would work, but the -a version wouldn't.
> 
> The manpage and usage bits should be updated to reflect this.  I'm not
> sure, but I think that's what Ruslan was getting at.
> 

I don't get it..it is not specifically mentioned as forbidden. So
it should work. 
What Ruslan meant (at least that is how I see it) is that
-o fstab is only mentioned in combination with -u. That is correct.
It still works with -a (without the -u), but specifying it is pointless
as its net effect is nill. So I would not update the manual page.

-Guido