From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 27 13:43:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6791716A41C for ; Fri, 27 May 2005 13:43:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@mail.lanta-net.ru) Received: from mail.lanta-net.ru (ns.lanta-net.ru [83.234.112.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B930A43D54 for ; Fri, 27 May 2005 13:43:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@mail.lanta-net.ru) Received: from [192.168.50.4] ([192.168.50.4] verified) by mail.lanta-net.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 296521 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 17:43:48 +0400 Message-ID: <4297244F.2050201@mail.lanta-net.ru> Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 17:44:47 +0400 From: "Timofey V. Chernousov" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050414) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <1116855501.4291dccd7125b@webmail.unixware.ro> <1b6c15ea050523090619f8c2f9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1b6c15ea050523090619f8c2f9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: best sollution (and also simple) to guarantee a bandwidth X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 13:43:47 -0000 is it ever possible to fair share bandwith of connection on receiving end? in theory this is not possible, becouse you cannot control how packets are sent to you, and a lot of UDP packets to one IP can get all available bandwith even if you "deny" them with ipfw. How deal goes in real situations? Carlos Alloatti wrote: > I have just done that, I set up FreeBSD with 2 network cards, bridge, > ipfw and dummynet. It works without a glitch, has been up for 20 days. > > Yo have to set up pipes and queues in ipfw rules > > On 5/23/05, John Brooks wrote: > >>altq in pf >> >>-- >>John Brooks >>john@day-light.com >> >>... >> >>>What is the best sollution (and also simple) to guarantee a bandwidth? >>> >> >>... >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > >