From owner-freebsd-arch Wed May 30 9:39: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from peter3.wemm.org (c1315225-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [65.0.135.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DA837B423; Wed, 30 May 2001 09:39:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by peter3.wemm.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4UGd6M20522; Wed, 30 May 2001 09:39:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27321380E; Wed, 30 May 2001 09:39:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Bruce Evans Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, "David E. O'Brien" Subject: Re: Overriding compiler flags (Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc.295 gcc.c) In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 09:39:06 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20010530163906.27321380E@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: [..] > > The latter three obviously don't cover general code, but the plethora > > of options is starting to get ugly. > > I agree. It got ugly already :-). And we don't even install the specs > file in /usr/libdata/gcc. Yes, because it just slows things down since gcc has to parse the file. Maybe we should install /usr/libdata/gcc/specs.default or something? I have found using the specs file *very* useful in the past when working on toolchain issues. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message