From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Aug 29 23:34: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from srcso.globis.ru (globis.ru [212.248.80.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FEA37B43E for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 23:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raduga.dyndns.org (raduga.sochi.net [212.248.82.76]) by srcso.globis.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20297 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:51:03 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igor@raduga.dyndns.org) Received: (from igor@localhost) by raduga.dyndns.org (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e7U6Xos08087 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:33:50 +0400 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:33:50 +0400 From: Igor Roboul To: FreeBSD questions Subject: softupdates. is it good? Message-ID: <20000830103350.A7720@linux.rainbow> Reply-To: igorr@crosswinds.net Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre4i X-Operating-System: Linux linux.rainbow 2.2.14-plus-SMP X-Best-Window-Manager: Window Maker (www.windowmaker.org) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I have FreeBSD 4.1-S server with two IDE disks on different controllers. First disk contains FreeBSD software and /home, second disk contains Samba shared data (lot of files, which are readed and writed but not deleted or created). Will softupdates give me more performance/stability ? I have good performance now, and I have _stable_ system now but ... ??? System: PIII/500 256Mb RAM, 1 UDMA66 disk, 1 UDMA33 disk, 10Mbit network (two interfaces), Samba 2.0.7, very few users (10-20, Windows95+DOS accounting application) -- Igor Roboul, Unix System Administrator & Programmer @ sanatorium "Raduga" http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=304744 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message